Unlurker
|
Replay
|
About
min-by
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
max-age
1h
2h
3h
4h
6h
8h
12h
18h
24h
36h
48h
72h
168h
window
5m
10m
15m
30m
45m
60m
90m
120m
user
luu
2h 26m
The AI cost of JavaScript frameworks (nolanlawson.com)
genshii
•
7m
|\-
Glad to see Astro doing well here. It's by far my favorite way to build sites of all kinds, both content rich MPAs, and react heavy web apps.
iammrpayments
•
8m
|\-
Interesting, I’m just sad svelte didnt behave better because of the LLM reading migration guide on every answer
neya
•
21m
|\-
This benchmark is too simplified to be meaningful. The choice of a framework is rarely based on speed alone, it factors in other elements like the user's domain knowledge, long term maintainability and the framework's track record itself w.r.t security and development of features. In this regard alone, it will make a lot of sense to spend extra $2 and 2 mins to trade off for a long-term maintainable codebase and code you can reason about than just something made quickly just to get it deployed fast. In my personal use case, that would be Svelte 5 for me and I'm sure it will be something else for everyone.
drnick1
•
27m
\-
Just use plain HTML for God's sake. HN demonstrates very well that you can do plenty without some Javascript monstrosity. At the very least, make your your websites degrades gracefully when JS is turned off.
r_lee
•
14m
\-
"do plenty" or just use React for everything and have a single thing where you don't need to worry about the limitations or having to remake the same stuff the framework provides? and what % of users have JS turned off? 0.00001%?
Top